Skip to content
Developer toolsNew techTop 9% of today's analysed ideas

Hardware buying calculator for local LLM speed

Build a small paid service or widget that lets people estimate local LLM inference speed (tokens per second) on specific consumer GPUs and CPUs before buying hardware, aimed at the growing crowd of hobbyists and developers choosing hardware for running Llama, Mistral, or similar models locally. Monetize via a benchmark database with affiliate hardware links, a Discord/community bot version, or a pro tier with saved comparisons and deeper model coverage.

Original post

What to build

A free calculator-style web tool (like Llmspeed) that lets a hobbyist pick a GPU/CPU + model + quantization and see estimated tokens-per-second before buying hardware, monetized via affiliate GPU/RAM links and a 'pro' tier with saved builds, multi-backend comparisons (llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM), and deeper model coverage.

Llmspeed's 257-point, 77-comment HN launch shows real appetite for a pre-purchase local-LLM speed estimator; the opportunity is to extend that into a monetizable benchmark database rather than a one-off demo.

Demand

Hobbyists and devs assembling PCs specifically to run Llama/Mistral locally want to avoid buying the wrong GPU, and they're vocal about it on HN and r/LocalLLaMA where tokens-per-second threads are a recurring topic.

  • Hacker News (Show HN)Engagement

    Show HN: Llmspeed - feel how fast a local LLM runs before you buy the hardware - 257 points, 77 comments on HN; high engagement at the source.

  • Hacker News (Show HN)News

    Show HN post indicates a tool exists to preview local LLM inference performance prior to hardware purchase, validating the underlying need.

Stack

  • Next.js
  • Benchmark dataset (llama.cpp/Ollama community results)
  • PostgreSQL or Supabase
  • Stripe for pro tier
  • Amazon/Newegg affiliate API
  • Discord Bot API for community bot

Solo + AI difficulty

The hard part is sourcing and maintaining an accurate, backend- and quantization-aware benchmark dataset that doesn't go stale as new models and runtimes ship; the UI, affiliate links, and Stripe paywall are straightforward for a solo builder with AI help. Rough MVP: 1-2 weeks for a basic estimator using scraped/crowdsourced numbers, longer if you want it to stay credible over time.

Entry threshold
Low barrier: a solo developer can scrape or crowdsource benchmark data and build a simple calculator or web tool in days, though building real credibility requires accumulating enough real-world benchmark data points.
Window
6-12 months

Where to find first users

  • r/LocalLLaMA
  • Hacker News (Show HN follow-up or relevant threads)
  • Reddit r/MachineLearning and r/buildapc (LLM rig threads)
  • Discord servers for Ollama/LM Studio/llama.cpp

Counter-signals & risks

  • Hardware vendors and community wikis (e.g. r/LocalLLaMA benchmark threads, llama.cpp discussions) already provide free crowd-sourced tokens-per-second benchmarks, reducing willingness to pay for a dedicated service.

  • Inference speed varies significantly by quantization, context length, backend (llama.cpp, vLLM, Ollama), and model version, making a simple hardware-to-speed estimator potentially inaccurate or quickly outdated.

  • The target market of hobbyists building local LLM rigs may be too small and price-sensitive to sustain a paid tier or generate meaningful affiliate revenue.

Original title: Show HN: Llmspeed – feel how fast a local LLM runs before you buy the hardware

  • Developer tools#1

    Niche file converters monetized via mass programmatic SEO

    Build a narrow, high search-intent file converter or utility (e.g. a specific format conversion niche like PNG to SVG, with vector output options for Cricut, laser cutters, CNC and embroidery machines) and scale it purely through programmatic SEO: hundreds of landing pages for each conversion pair and long-tail blog content in multiple languages. The proven playbook is one utility, one dominant acquisition channel (SEO), and deep format coverage rather than a broad feature set.

    Demand
    7/10
    est.
    Buildability
    8/10
    est.
    Competition
    5/10
    est.
    via Reddit
    44 competitors
  • Developer tools#2

    Scope-creep auditor for AI coding agent diffs

    Build a diff-auditing tool for AI coding agents that flags everything an agent changed beyond the requested fix - unrelated file edits, deleted comments, altered formatting, touched dependencies, or scope creep. Ship it as a CLI, GitHub Action, or VS Code extension targeting developers using Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and similar agents who need a quick sanity check before merging agent-generated diffs.

    Demand
    3/10
    measured
    Buildability
    8/10
    est.
    Competition
    10/10
    est.
    via Hacker News
    0No named competitors
  • Developer tools#3

    CI gate that blocks PRs on regressed AI agent traces

    Build a lightweight hosted or self-hosted add-on for AI agent CI pipelines that grades production LLM traces, clusters recurring failure modes, and auto-generates regression tests from frozen failure traces, then blocks merges when a PR reintroduces a known failure. Target solo devs and small teams shipping LLM agents who need a cheap drop-in CI gate instead of building eval infrastructure themselves.

    Demand
    8/10
    measured
    Buildability
    6/10
    est.
    Competition
    6/10
    est.
    via GitHub
    33 competitors
Hardware buying calculator for local LLM speed — Nichr