Bug-to-file prediction as a triage API
Package a bug-to-file localization model as an API or IDE/CI plugin that, given a bug report or stack trace, predicts which files in a repo need to change. Sell it to engineering teams as a triage accelerator, or bundle it into code review and bug tracker tools (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) to auto-suggest owners and files for incoming bugs, cutting time spent hunting through large codebases.
What to build
A CLI/IDE extension for solo developers and small teams that takes a bug report or stack trace and predicts which files in the repo need to change, using a bug-localization model — shippable as a VS Code extension or GitHub Action that comments on issues with suggested files.
Bug triage eats hours hunting through unfamiliar codebases; a model trained on real-world fix history can shortcut that search and turn a bug report straight into a ranked file list.
Demand
Solo devs and small teams maintaining large or inherited codebases want faster triage, and AI coding assistants have primed users to expect this kind of automated code navigation.
- Hacker NewsAnnouncement
Show HN: Wn – find the files a bug touches, trained on 1.1M real fixes — 6 points, 0 comments on HN.
Stack
- OpenAI/Claude API for report parsing
- Sentence embeddings (e.g. sentence-transformers)
- GitHub Issues/Actions API
- VS Code Extension API
- Postgres or SQLite for repo file index
- Supabase
Solo + AI difficulty
The hard part is the ML model itself (already built by the original project, so a builder could fork/wrap it rather than retrain); the easy part is wiring a GitHub Action or VS Code extension around an existing API. Time-to-MVP is roughly 1-2 weeks if reusing the open-source model, versus months if training a proprietary one.
- Entry threshold
- Model training on 1.1M fixes is already done by the original author, so a builder would need to wrap it as a hosted API, VS Code extension, or GitHub App with repo indexing; a usable MVP wrapper is a few weeks of work but real integration into CI or issue trackers to be reliable takes more iteration.
- Window
- 3-6 months
Where to find first users
- Show HN follow-up post
- GitHub Marketplace listing for the Action
- r/programming and r/devops
- Indie hacker / build-in-public communities
Competitors
- Wn (where-next, the original open-source project)
Counter-signals & risks
Bug localization accuracy trained on public/open-source fix datasets may not generalize well to proprietary, large, or monorepo codebases with different architectures and conventions
Existing bug tracker and IDE ecosystems (e.g., GitHub Copilot, Sentry, Jira integrations) may add similar file-prediction features natively, reducing the market for a standalone tool
Show HN traction and a novel model do not guarantee enterprise adoption, since engineering teams may be cautious about trusting automated triage suggestions without strong precision/recall guarantees
Original title: Show HN: Wn – find the files a bug touches, trained on 1.1M real fixes
Related signals
- Developer tools#7
MCP tools for reliable AI document editing
Build narrow MCP servers or agent tool-plugins that let AI agents reliably edit specific file formats (Word/OOXML, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF forms) without burning context on XML mechanics or losing fidelity through Markdown round-trips. Target agentic workflow builders, legal/pharma/finance document-automation teams, and no-code AI app builders who need a drop-in editing tool instead of building one from python-docx or pandoc themselves.
Demand6/10est.Buildability6/10est.Competition8/10est.via Hacker News11 competitor - Developer tools#8
Spend killswitch for runaway coding agents
Build a spend-guardrail and kill-switch tool for autonomous coding agents (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) that enforces hard dollar/token caps, blocks uncontrolled sub-agent spawning, and sends real-time alerts before costs run away. Target solo developers and small teams who run agentic coding sessions without any built-in budget controls from the vendor.
Demand6/10est.Buildability6/10est.Competition6/10est.via Hacker News33 competitors - Developer tools#13
Agentic CLI wrappers for cloud provider APIs
Build agentic CLI or chat-driven wrappers for other major cloud and infra provider APIs that still lack a native agentic interface (AWS, GCP, Vercel, Supabase, DigitalOcean). Package it as a lightweight tool developers install to let an AI agent manage DNS, workers, KV, R2 and other services via natural language instead of clicking through dashboards or memorizing CLI flags.
Demand9/10measuredBuildability8/10est.Competition10/10est.via Hacker News0No named competitors